Wednesday, 17 July 2013

Forging an Australian National Identity

As a nation colonised by the British and part of the Commonwealth, loyalty to the Monarchy has long been considered an integral element to the Australian identity. However since colonisation there has existed a desire within the Australian community to diverge from the influence of our “Mother Country” and forge an individualised Australian identity based on Australian values. This notion of shifting from British ideals has gained momentum in society and has been exemplified in a myriad of key events that have taken place in recent Australian history.

In 1963 the Holt government announced that their current Australian currency which had been inherited by Britain was going to be replaced in favour of decimal coinage. This decision reflected the attitude of Australians at that time who were keen to implement steps which would legitimise the notion of constructing an independent Australian identity through divergence from Monarchical influence. The people of Australia offered over 1000 suggestions for the name of the new currency. Whilst some such as the “austral” and the “emu” were more neutral, many such as the “deci-mate”, “the boomer”, “the roo”, the kanga, and the “dinkum” shared a common ground in reflecting quintessential Australian values like good humour, larrikin-ism and a joking attitude.

Unfortunately for contenders like the “deci-mate”, the government at the time of the currency shift was Liberal and lead by PM Harold Holt. The liberal party are generally typified by right-wing conservatism and a comparatively greater sense of loyalty to the Monarchy, thus they favoured a name which denoted and reinforced Australia's ties to the colony. After Holt's “close and careful examination” “the royal” was announced to an expectant nation and subsequently met with collective disapproval and scorn. Whilst a relatively neural term, “dollar” was eventually decided on, Australia's reaction to the blatantly Monarchist “royal” name is evidence of the nation's almost unanimous yearning to distinguish ourselves from the colony and create a distinctly Australian identity typified by our own national values.

Soon after the currency shift came the implementation of metrication in Australia which was initiated in 1970 and was completed by 1988. Along with our original currency, the imperial measuring system was another inheritance from our mother country. Although contrastingly to the “dollar” vs. “royal” debacle, this shift was necessitated by both the aim of further forging a distinctly national identity and practicality which was also met with acceptance from the general public. Despite the inherent advantages of the metric system which involve substantially increased efficiency in teaching mathematics and science, a large proportion of the UK reject the system as they perceive it as submission to the European Union.

In the midst of the metrication came another integral decision implemented by the Whitlam government in 1973. They decided that Australia needed a new national anthem that would signify us as a separate and distinct entity from the colony and celebrate our uniqueness. A nation wide survey was held to determine a replacement for “God Save the Queen”, a song which celebrates Australia as a nation of subservience to the colony and connotes the subjugation of ours people under the empire. “Advanced Australia Fair” was selected and became the national anthem, except on occasions of exceptionally regal significance. “Advanced Australia Fair” purports our country as a young, independent, generous, prosperous, democratic and secular nation who doesn't pander to the Monarchy. The song correlates to the social movement which was gaining momentum in the 70's which saw for the first time an embracing of Australian cultures and attempts to eradicate the notion of a cultural cringe.

However in 1976 the Fraser government highlighted their alignment with the monarchy by reinstating “God Save the Queen” as the default anthem. Since 1945, Australia has seen the permanent migration of more than seven million people and our nation is becoming more and more culturally diverse by the day. It is for this reason that one could argue that an anthem such as “God Save the Queen” which signifies our British origin was irrelevant to a substantial proportion of Australian society in the 1970's because it does not reflect our status as a multicultural country. To compensate for the uproar of protest from the Australian people a plebiscite was conducted (as an optional additional question in the 1977 referendum) to chose the Nation Song which would be used when it was desired to markedly distinguish a separate Australian Identity. Advance Australia Fair” received 43.29%, Waltzing Matilda received 28.28%, Song of Australia received 9.65% and God Save the Queen received 18.78%. Thus “Advance Australia Fair” was once again reinstated on April 1984 under the conduction of PM Bob Hawke.

The initial decision to shift from “God Save the Queen” and the unanimous outcry when it was reinstated in 1976 signifies the extent to which the dynamics and values of Australian society have shifted. The concept that the majority of Australian people no longer identify with the British ideals and values conveyed in their anthem reflects the necessity for us to pioneer a national image that symbolises what typifies Australian culture and our way of life. 

No comments:

Post a Comment