Kaitlyn Krahe – Our Father Analysis
The Our Father is a prayer that is
central to Christianity. Prayer is a staple element to religious
ceremony and ritual as it enables individuals to experience a
spiritual connection with their omnipotent being of preference.
Depending on the context in which the prayer is uttered, its function
can vary slightly. For example; a prayer can be spoken by an entire
Parish in order to communicate with God whilst also fostering a sense
connectedness between the congregation itself. Conversely, a prayer
may serve as a private and personal ritual for an individual.
The relatively formal register of this
text is necessitated by the solemn and reverent nature of this text
type. It is likely that the Our Father was initially translated into
English using a register that was relatively formal for its time.
Since then, liberalisation,
colloquialisation, the push for an egalitarian society and social
democracy has meant that we are seeing informal language appearing
increasingly in the provinces that were once reserved for formal
language. The fact that language is becoming more casual
means that texts such as the Our Father appear extremely formal by
today's standard.
The prayer is constituted by both
declarative (lines 1-5) and imperative sentences (lines 6-10). Whilst
the declarative sentences are appropriate, one could contend that it
is paradoxical to utilise imperative sentences that have a demanding
nature and high modality in a text type that is intended to be
extremely reverent and respectful of a deity. Further contrasting to
the text's intended formality are the mostly coordinating
conjunctions used between clauses (line 10, 9, 7, 8) to form compound
sentences. However, the coordinating conjunctions help create
fluidity and cohesiveness within the text.
The archaic morphemes “art” (second
person present indicative of “to be”) and “thy” (possessive
pronoun of 2nd person singular) allude to the age of the prayer. They
would be considered non standard in today's spoken domain. Such
relics indicate that the prayer is doomed to be frozen in time unless
attempts are made to modernise it. Otherwise in years to come, as
such morphemes become obsolete, the prayer will shift from being
highly formal to difficult to understand.
A variant of fronting known as
left-dislocation occurs in line 1. The subject “Father” is given
the initial position in the clause for extra focus. When spoken, the
significance of the subject would be highlighted both by its location
in the clause and by the implied pause denoted by the comma. After
this initial reference, pronouns such as “who” and “thy” are
use to refer back to the subject to prevent constant repetition of
“Father”. This contributes to the fluency and cohesiveness of the
text. The chaining effect of the “topic before comment” nature of
the information flow, or front focus of the subject also gives the
text coherence.
Use of the agentless passive voice in
line 2 heightens the gravitas connoted by the “hallowed” nature
of the Lord's name. The omission of the agent implies that “the
Father” is considered holy and respected by everyone rather than
just a particular group. The object-verb inversion within the clause
is a variant of fronting which functions to further stress the
significance of the “Father's” holiness.
Clefting occurs in line 6 in order to
divide what would otherwise be one clause into two smaller and more
distinct demands with a comma. Rather than presenting the two
requests for “daily bread” and “this day” in one continuous
clause, the clefting stresses that each of the aspects are equally
important.
The punctuation connotes prosody
graphemically. Lines 1 to 4 end with commas, which in speech signal a
small pause. Contrastingly, lines 7, 8, 10 and 5 each end with a full
stop. Typically, a slightly extended pause is signalled by full stops
in contrast to commas. Consequently, lines 7, 8, 10 and 5 seem more
disjointed from the text and appear to stand out.
The elements of phonological pattering
such as rhyme (lines 3 and 4) and assonance (lines 7 8 9) in the text
enables it to conform well to its formal, spoken mode. These aspects
of the prayer also contribute the rhythmic, chant-like quality that
prayers tend to acquire when spoken en masse. These qualities enhance
the reverent nature of the prayer.